Filed
6:00 a.m. EST
03.04.2025
Policy shift follows a Marshall Project – Cleveland and News 5 Cleveland investigation into the October shooting of a teen by a deputy.
Sheriff Harold Pretel announced a new bodycam policy in February 2025. Videos from deadly-force encounters will now be released within seven days.
The Cuyahoga County Sheriff’s Department quietly updated its policy to allow the release of body camera footage from deputy shootings within seven business days, The Marshall Project and News 5 Cleveland have learned.
The updated body camera policy follows an investigation by the news outlets into how the sheriff’s department refused to release video from deputy shootings. Last October, the department did not release footage for nearly four months after a deputy shot a teenager in Cleveland.
County officials released the video hours before the news outlets published the joint investigation.
Neither Sheriff Harold Pretel nor County Executive Chris Ronayne would say why the sheriff’s department updated its policy without announcing the change to the public.
The new policy took effect Feb. 14, records show.
“The policy update aligns with nationwide best practices regarding the release of public information,” Pretel wrote in a statement. “The updated policy is a step toward strengthening trust between residents and law enforcement.”
The Marshall Project – Cleveland and News 5 Cleveland repeatedly asked to interview Pretel and Ronayne, but a county spokesperson said neither was available.
This video contains police bodycam footage that includes the sound of gunshots, which are being fired toward a teen.
The policy update is similar to laws passed in Cleveland in 2022 and Akron in 2021, which require footage of shootings to be released within seven days. The Cleveland law also applies to independent police agencies that operate inside the city. It does not apply to the sheriff’s department or federal or state officers.
While the policy update says footage should be available for release within seven business days, Cleveland and Akron’s policies are more direct, essentially promising the footage within seven days.
Cleveland and Akron will also release footage from at least three recording devices, if multiple devices captured the encounter. Pretel’s update doesn’t specify how much footage will be released.
Five Cuyahoga County Council members told the news outlets on Feb. 25 that they were unaware of the policy change. They only learned of the change from reporters. Several said Pretel should have notified the entire council about the policy update.
County Council President Dale Miller said seven business days is reasonable to release video footage. But after conferring with the council’s attorney, Miller said he considers the word “should” imprecise language.
“I would prefer ‘shall’ with possible exceptions noted if necessary,” he added.
County Councilman Martin J. Sweeney commended Pretel’s about-face, but called the move “long overdue.” He praised The Marshall Project – Cleveland and News 5 Cleveland for prompting Pretel to act and bring greater transparency to the sheriff’s department.
“We have a new policy because of that, and that is something that is in the best interests of the people of Cuyahoga County,” Sweeney said. “I truly believe that.”
The mothers of three teenagers who were chased by the sheriff’s deputies in October said they were kept in the dark about the shooting. They did not learn which police agency shot the child until meeting with The Marshall Project – Cleveland and News 5 Cleveland.
The shooting unfolded as Cuyahoga County sheriff’s deputies said they were in pursuit of a stolen Nissan carrying three people, one possibly armed.
The chase ended in a crash near East 26th Street and Superior Avenue in downtown Cleveland, prompting the three teenagers inside to run. Deputies opened fire, striking the 15-year-old boy in the leg, records show.
The teen was treated for a single gunshot wound and released to county juvenile court authorities. He and the two other teens face a number of delinquency charges.
A’aishah Rogers, the mother of the injured teen, called it horrifying to watch the videos. She watched them for the first time when the news outlets published their joint investigation. County officials, she said, should have allowed her family to view them first.
“Me and my family members shouldn’t have to see this type of footage on TV with everyone else,” she said.
Rogers said she became angry after watching the videos countless times because it appears Deputy Isen Vajusi opened fire as he jumped out of his car. The deputy is then heard saying he thought he spotted a gun in her son’s hand.
“I saw no gun; I saw nothing silver,” she said. “I did see a child running from police, and I heard six gunshots.”
She said the sheriff’s department needs to do more than update a policy to build community trust. Rogers is still left with unanswered questions, since deputies did not find a gun near her son.
“To me, it still smells like a cover-up,” she said.
While Cleveland police are required by city law to release videos of officer shootings, the sheriff’s Downtown Safety Patrol, despite operating on those same Cleveland streets, was not held to the same oversight standards.
Subodh Chandra, a civil rights attorney and former Cleveland law director, said releasing video footage is imperative for the public.
“The bodycam and dash cam videos that law enforcement use literally exist for the purpose of accountability and transparency,” he said.
